Detroit Judge Faces Legal Action For Controversial Incident During Field Trip
In a shocking development this Wednesday in Detroit, a judge finds himself at the center of a court case. He is being accused of humiliation, false arrest, and unlawful detention after forcing a teenager to change into jail clothes and wear handcuffs during a field trip to the 36th District Court.
Backstory Of The Incident
On August 13, 15-year-old Eva Goodman was on a community involvement field trip led by the non-profit group, The Greening of Detroit. The excursion comprised a visit to the 36th District Court, where Judge Kenneth King reportedly singled out Eva for falling asleep and for what he perceived as her negative attitude during court proceedings.
As a result, King ordered Eva into jail clothing and placed in handcuff, all of which was broadcast live on a video stream from his court. He further threatened the teenager with juvenile detention in front of her peers, but eventually released her.
Judge Kenneth King’s Actions and Repercussions
As outlined in the lawsuit, Goodman’s attorneys, Gary Felty Jr. and James Harrington, argue that King’s behaviors were “extreme and outrageous and calculated for the purpose of inflicting fear and severe emotional distress.” It is believed that this is the latest episode in a rather controversial career for King, as he has since been removed from courtroom duties until he finishes compulsory training. The lawsuit seeks financial compensation of more than $75,000 for Goodman.
When asked to comment on the incident, King claimed he wanted the situation to feel real for Eva, instilling her with the fear of incarceration, though he admitted there was no substantial chance of him sending her to jail.
The Aftermath of the Incident On The Teenager
The teenager’s mother, Latoreya Till, shared with reporters the emotional impact the episode has had on her daughter. “It’s been pretty devastating,” stated Till.” As she continued, “Eva doesn’t want to come outside. She doesn’t want to be involved with anyone else but her family, relatives. It’s hard for her to sleep at night. She’s asking me, ‘Why the judge do me like this out of all the kids?’“
This case serves as a stark reminder of the influence and full authority those who operate within legal framework possess, and of the need for their actions to be held to the highest measure of scrutiny and accountability. As the courtroom awaits more evidence and discussion on this case, the public watches on with bated breath for the ruling that may redefine the boundaries between the power of law and respect for individual rights.
